From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-23 15:38:36
At 11:16 AM 1/23/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> The question would be, then, whether or not the Windows regression
>>>> report should only be using gcc-nocygwin, or if it maybe should be
>>>> using both toolsets.
>>> We have a mingw toolset; it could always be done with gcc and mingw.
>> Yes... that would be up to Beman I guess. It would require yet another
>> installed compiler, though, so the gcc-nocygwin would probably be
>Fine with me
I'm not enthusiastic about another compiler. I haven't even gotten around
to getting the Comeau compiler to work, and that would seem to be more
important that a second gcc set of tests.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk