Re: [jamboost] STLport in V2

From: Jürgen Hunold (hunold+lists.Boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-29 16:10:06

Am Mittwoch 29 Januar 2003 07:21 schrieb Vladimir Prus:
> Jürgen Hunold wrote:
> > Am Dienstag 28 Januar 2003 17:08 schrieb Vladimir Prus:

> Oops, that's a documentation issue. You can say something like
[...]
> is given, you can look at rule "init" in something.jam to figure out
> what configuration parameters can be passed.

Thanks. Noted.

> > (Hardcoding dll-path with -Wl,-rpath would be great, too).
>
> Would adding -Wl,-rpath *anywhere* in the command line help? I though
> that no, in which case this feature cannot be implemented
> immediately.

Well, I've adjusted my qmake-environment to put
a -Wl,-rpath,$LIB -L$LIB -l$LIB for each library. Works very well at 
least for gcc-3.2.1 on linux. AFAIK you should be able to change the 
-Wl and -L options because they are independent. 

> > It does not work with qt-toolset. bjam says:
> Oh, damn! I've changed some interface for the sake of stlport
> toolset, and that broke qt. Really, plain regression tests are not
> enough -- have to test examples too. Should be fixed now.

Yes, thanks. I've already removed my hardcoded STLport support.

> >>Support for debug mode is next thing --- once I figure out how to

> Yea, that's what I though is right. Maybe it's just bad luck, but I
> get linker errors, and if I add "-lpthread" I only reduce the number
> of them. Maybe some configuration problem here.

This is strange. You can mail me the output. Perhaps I can find 
something.

Yours, 

Jürgen
'
-- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Institut für Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau
* voice: ++49 511 762-2529 ! und -betrieb, Universität Hannover
* fax : ++49 511 762-3001 ! Appelstrasse 9a, D-30167 Hannover
* hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive.uni-hannover.de