From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-23 09:13:42
"pfrants <patrick_at_[hidden]>" <patrick_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I am perfectly happy with Boost 1.28, but the simple fact that you
> people are spending 200% of your efforts on V2 leads me to believe
> it must be a giant leap from 1.28.
> Will a reasonably well working version be available within
> weeks/months? I am working with gcc under Solaris and Windows 2000.
> It took some time to get happy with 1.28, so therefore I'd not like
> to switch to V2 too early...
Well, you would definitely be taking some risk by switching now, but
we do have some happy users already, and we support gcc. It hasn't
been tested on Solaris, but it has on windows. I don't see why it
shouldn't work. If you look around the boost tree you'll see quite a
few Jamfile.v2 files which demonstrate how to write v2
Jamfiles... you might just try it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk