From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-11 10:37:30
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > I've fixed this in the way I considered most simple. Now, if <dependency>
>> > is used in build properties, the refered target will be built, and it's
>> > usage requirements will be applied. However, no dependency will be
>> > automatically established. This fixed the <dependency> problem.
>> > The <library> feature now works in a special way: the 'linking-generator'
>> > looks on all <library> features, and adds dependency explicitly.
>> > The changes are in CVS now. Let me know what you think.
>> I think it's counterintuitive to have a feature called <dependency>
>> which doesn't establish a dependency. :-)
> You are right. Better names are welcome. I though about <reference> but
> wasn't sure enough to make the change.
How about <uses> ?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk