Re: [jamboost] Boost.Build stress test

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-19 06:51:18

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I'm very interested in do-nothing timing. Can you run "bjam -d+10" on an 
> unmodified tree and send me the output. This will tell what consumes most 
> time.
>
>> <B> Command line overflow on link (Show-stopper!). Some reasons
>> <C> Command line overflow on compile (Show-stopper!). Some reasons
>> <D> Command line overflow on archive/dll (Show-stopper!). Some

Something's suspicious about this, at least if he's using the gcc
toolset... Oh, yeah; I forgot we need to add a small enhancement for
potentially long one-line actions on NT.

I'm kind of shocked about the problem on compilation though.
Ali, are you using Win98 or something?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com