From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-31 12:25:38
David Abrahams wrote:
> Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > The gcc-tools documentation suggests that doing
> > bjam -sGXX=g++-3.2.1
> > ought to do the right thing, however it appears not to.
> It's a known issue. The workaround is [...]
Thanks, that works fine now.
Is there any reason why it wouldn't be safe to fix it with
something like the patch in my previous email? Just
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk