Re: [jamboost] Re: property-adjuster?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-16 07:50:56

David Abrahams wrote:

> I understand that now. I still think it's an overly-complicated and
> general way to get there. I'll need to look a little more-carefully,
> but my sense is that something far simpler is possible.
>
> In the meantime, could you:
>
> a. Explain why this code manipulates incidental features in some
> places but only free features in others?

Could you clarify what code manipulates incidetanl features?

> b. Add the above (after "let me explain") as a comment to the
> directly-requested-properties-adjuster?

Done.

- Volodya