Re: cool generators insight

From: David Abrahams (gclbb-jamboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-05 08:30:33

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> {CPP,CPP} <- ECPP (only first CPP must be further converted into NM_ASM)

How is that not an automatic ambiguity?

You might get around that by generating a derived type of CPP,
e.g. NM_CPP, which can be converted into NM_ASM.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com