From: David Abrahams (gclbb-jamboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-17 10:09:52
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I can only add that
> toolsets would be a complex thing if Boost.Build will use SCons as backend.
> For one thing, we very much like the mechanism for translating properties
> into compiler flags. For other thing, it's better to integrate with Scons
> tools handling: yes, we can generate command like options ourself, and just
> pass it via environment, but that non optimal, since SCons has some code for
> toolset already.
IIUC you mean "on one hand... on the other hand..."
These two "things" are meant to be in tension with one another, right?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk