From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-17 10:35:09
[2003-06-17] David Abrahams wrote:
>Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> (BTW, are you guys aware that Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve is already using
>>> or shipping Boost, I believe, with an SCons-based build system for
>>> cctbx, his Computational Crystallography ToolBox? I guess he has about
>>> twenty lines of Python code that parse up the .jam or .bjam or whatever
>>> files and turn them into calls into the SCons build engine. Might be a
>>> useful starting point to look at how someone else has done some of the
>>> basic stuff.)
>> Need to look. Since Python version of Boost.Build is only distant
>> plan for now, we'd have a lot of Jam code by the time it
>> works. Another alternative I was thinking about was extending Python
>> with Jam. So, you'd have Python function "compile_jam_file", or
>That sounds like we'd be giving up many/most of the advantages of
>Python. Consider Jam's poor data abstraction capability. We
>wouldn't even be able to touch regular Python classes.
Perhaps at this point, since it is far of, and I think other design changes
are on the table...
Would using some other scripting language be an option? Like Lua which has a
very low embedding cost.
Could we rewrite the parts of Jam that are usefull, like the dependency
engine, in C++ and use them in library form?
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk