From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-10 06:33:50
David Abrahams wrote:
> > Sure. What I did was a quick change to make it work in common
> > configuration. Eventually we must improve V2 gcc toolset to do everythin
> > that V1 toolset can. That's now filed as
> > http://zigzag.cs.msu.su:7814/scarab/issues/id/BB45
> > though I'm not 100% when this will be addressed.
> I really want to make it a priority to replace v1 with v2 completely.
> I think we should do that before *anything* else gets done. Continued
> use of v1 prevents me from pouring any serious energy into v2
I agree. As far as I'm concerned, there are two issues which needs to be
resolved before v1 is declared *really* obsolete.
First is regression testing framework for boost.
Second is optimization.
FWIW, that's already on the top of my priority list.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk