Re: [jamboost] Re: paths and subprojects: Anyone? Beuhler?

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-30 09:43:29

[2003-07-30] Paul Schmidt wrote:

>--- In jamboost_at_[hidden], Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_c...> wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing you wonder why nobody has replied your email yet? I
>can't speak 
>> only for myself, and the reasons are:
>> 1. I'm mostly V2 developer
>> 2. Your email really had too little information. The bugs reporting
>guidelines 
>> for V2 (available in http://boost.sf.net/boost-build2/hacking.txt)
>quite 
>> accurately descrive what is desired. We can't help much unless you
>provide 
>> small testcase which fails.
>
>I'll be happy to email a zip of the test hierarchy to anyone who's
>willing to help. I don't see a direct way of attaching a file to these
>messages, but I could be missing something, I guess.

Hmm, you seem to be using the Yahoo web interface directly? Can you send
email directly to jamboost_at_[hidden] ?

>I don't know that what I'm seeing is a bug; I'm perfectly willing to
>believe it's cockpit error - that's the major reason I'm not trying to
>submit this problem as a bug.
>
>OTOH, if it *is* a bug, given that everyone's attention is on V2 at
>this point, what's the likelyhood it'd be addressed any time soon? 

Not everyone's attention is on V2... we still use V1. So it's likely to get
some reasonable response time, 1 or 2 days. But since some of us have busy
work lives, sometimes the delay is longer.

Anyway the reason for the longer delay this is what Volodya said. It's hard
to respond without a test case. There just isn't enough info. You can send
it to me directly at any of my emails.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq