From: David Abrahams (gclbb-jamboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-31 10:20:19
Christopher Currie <Christopher_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I think the problem here is that the user doesn't have a way to say,
>> "this thing is really just a dependency of some other main target;
>> don't build it by default".
>> dependency lib B : b.cpp ;
>> lib B : b.cpp ;
>> don't-build B ;
>> or some such thing.
> I believe Milestone 6 has a rule, 'explicit', that does what you want.
Great! But the contentious issue will still be: "can we *please* get
rid of property-adjuster?"
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk