From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-03 16:29:10
At 06:30 PM 7/20/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
>[2003-07-16] Rene Rivera wrote:
>>The way to handle the maintainance aspect is to standardize what the
>>behaviour is for libraries and dlls and codify that into either the
>>rule, or preferably another rule which better describes the intent.
>OK I've done some of the work on this. I did some additions and
>modifications to the default build, what you get when running bjam at the
>boost_root. The changes are...
I've started to test your branch.
It is going to take a while to sort through it all, but here are a couple
of initial issues:
* We need to test this build process on a daily basis. I don't know if that
means adding to the current regression tests or adding a separate test
* The include directory and its sub-directories are getting built, and have
files with what appears to be the correct names. The contents of the files
are all identical, and are not at all correct.
Thanks for working on this. It looks promising.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk