Re: [jamboost] Re: BBv2: one library, two compilers (win: cl, icl)

From: Jürgen Hunold (hunold+lists.Boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-05 03:12:41

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi ! 

On Thursday 04 September 2003 19:30, David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> That's not the way I intended for intel support to work, though it
> seems to be a decent stopgap measure. intel is supposed to be a
> vendor variant, so that we can have an intel.jam toolset which
> inherits from msvc and sets the vendor.

Well, what about intel compiler for linux ? 
This should be a vendor variant of gcc (>= 3.3, of course), since the 
goal is to have intel-linux link-compatible to g++ sometime in the near 
future.
intel-linux compiler is flag _and_ behaviour compatible with gcc 
already. It even supports <hardcode-dll-path> options with the same 
syntax ..
Is ist possible to declare two toolsets in one .jam file ?
Or how do we name them otherwise ?

Yours,

Jürgen

- -- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Institut für Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau
* voice: ++49 511 762-2529 ! und -betrieb, Universität Hannover  
* fax : ++49 511 762-3001 ! Appelstrasse 9a, D-30167 Hannover
* hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WEV5ljbJ/LLrxrYRAg3NAKCrNwdts9Mn/DY9rsWjGVOVGYtByQCgxYfz
rzup0G9+vFQq5qFgjp9aGqU=
=M8xj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----