From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-26 00:33:41
David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > brock_peabody wrote:
> >> I am trying to learn how to use boost build V2. Am I correct in
> >> thinking that it is not worthwhile to learn V1?
> > Probably so. IMO, V2 is simpler and quite usable.
> I'm not so sure about that. Even with my involvement in v2
> development I found it much easier to get my project going with v1.
> It may have to do in part with the fact that documentation is more
This is quite subjective (and that's why I said "probably"). Another reason
why you can have problems is that your involvement is not continuous. When
you get back after a while, things are somewhat changed and you're confused.
> There is also support for many more toolsets in v1.
Sure. Let me implement regression testing first, though ;-)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk