From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-13 10:08:47
[2003-10-13] Vladimir Prus wrote:
>David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > There's one question: I would be interested to know if the problem that
>> > Dave reported in email called "dependency analysis bug" is cleared or
>> > not. But I don't think it's show-stopper.
>> IIRC, you diagnosed my report as a non-bug (the #include of the
>> dependent file was masked by PP directives). Then you found other
>> problems, which I suppose you could check yourself(?)
>I've originally diagnosed the problem as non-bug, that's true. However,
>I've found out a long dependency chain from is_class_test.cpp to
>via Boost.Test, which means that both is_class_test.cpp and Boost.Test
>be recompiled when you change is_class.hpp is touched. That happens to me,
>however, I'm not sure if this happens to you.
>IIRC, the symptoms of the original problems were somewhat different for me:
>you had no recompiles at all, while I had only some files recompiled.
>why there's a chance the bug still exists for you.
Well given that issue wont get resolved soon... I'll go ahead with the
release tonight (tomorrow morning for Volodya).
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk