Re: [jamboost] How to define additional transformations?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-16 00:48:43

Peter Steiner wrote:
> > and it fact, stripping a binary is a simple transformation, so the
> > process is just as described. I attach a working example.
>
> This approach works fine. Thanks!

Great.

> > There's another solution for your problem: make the feature that
> > determines if the target is stripped or not.
>
> ...
>
> > I attach the working example of this as well. It would be interesting to
> > know this approach you find better.
>
> I like the first approach better. The second is based on the
> coincidence that stripping can as well be done while linking. But
> the first approach serves as a generic step of a possible larger
> sequence.

Okay.

- Volodya

>
> Regards, Peter