Re: [jamboost] Re: Header scanning change

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-20 10:38:15

David Abrahams wrote:

> > I'm not sure if it's necessary right now, but the change seems
> > attractive.
>
> I'd like to discourage any change which hardcodes the way search paths
> are handled. I can't tell if that's happening here, so please ignore
> me if it's not.

I hope it's not happening here. The idea is that scanners which care about 
binding of scanned target, can easily get it. Scanners which don't, can 
ignore the extra parameter. 

Anyway, I'll have to do more profiling before adding such a code.

- Volodya