Re: [jamboost] Final target paths proposal

From: Pedro Ferreira (pedro.ferreira_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 10:04:00

Hi Volodya,

> Problems only arise when two targets are generated with the same name, but
> different properties:
>
> exe a : a.cpp : <define>A ;
> exe b : b.cpp : <define>B ;

I assume you meant:

exe a : a.cpp : <define>A ;
exe b : a.cpp : <define>B ;

> How does that sound? This solution will both simplify V2 code and target
> paths...

Sounds good to me, provided that a potential conflict is actually detected.

Regards,

Pedro