From: Christopher Currie (Christopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-28 10:34:25
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Well, given the length of current 'release_procedure.txt', an extra step of
> bumping version after release is nothing :-). But will that solve the
> problem? I mean, we can introduce 3 new builtins between milestone releases.
> If we don't bump version each time, it can cause the same problem for persons
> who update their Boost.Build tree.
True, and I think it's overkill to bump the minor version for every
change. You're right, I'll just have to remember to rebuild bjam every
time I update from CVS. Either that or be better about reading the list. :-)
Thanks for listening,
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk