Re: Fwd: Re: jam_src needs a version bump

From: Christopher Currie (Christopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-28 10:34:25

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Well, given the length of current 'release_procedure.txt', an extra step of 
> bumping version after release is nothing :-). But will that solve the 
> problem? I mean, we can introduce 3 new builtins between milestone releases.
> If we don't bump version each time, it can cause the same problem for persons 
> who update their Boost.Build tree.

True, and I think it's overkill to bump the minor version for every 
change. You're right, I'll just have to remember to rebuild bjam every 
time I update from CVS. Either that or be better about reading the list. :-)

Thanks for listening,
Christopher