From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-01 02:10:23
Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> and have it work, no matter what the version is.
>> </user hat on>
> Oh I agree with the guy wearing the hat! Best way to deal with this is
> keep the strict signature but to make toolset.jam generate a default
> value for the version parameter in this case.
> This would mean the every <toolset>xx would have a <toolset:xx-version>
IMO, it would be too confusing for the gcc-3.0 user if his build
results reflected gcc-3.3 in any way. If the default version were
stripped from all build results, then it's OK as an implementation
technique, but if the user writes:
using gcc : 3.1 ;
the default would have to change to 3.1.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk