Re: <user-interface> and dependencies

From: brock_peabody (bpyama_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-03 14:52:29

--- In jamboost_at_[hidden], Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_c...> wrote:

> I think that propagaration is still the simplest solution, though 
it's a 
> question if it's right or not. But it's a question for you, and 
other users.

I don't think I understand the system well enough to say that this 
solution is more correct. It 'feels' better off-hand.

> What's you're asking is 
> 
> http://zigzag.cs.msu.su:7814/scarab/issues/id/BB19
> 

I can't get to this issue. Could you forward me the issue as text?

> I'd be happy to accept any resolution. If you belive this feature 
is needed 
> and is willing to invest some time in it, both in design and 
inplementation, 
> you're welcome!

I will read the exchange between you and Jurgen and start looking at 
the code. Is it all in 'C'? That would certainly dampen my 
enthusiasm about contributing. Am I missing something?

Also, I have made the change to builtin.jam and verified that it 
works as expected. How do I submit the fix?

Brock