Re: [jamboost] Re: Question about [ common-names ]

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-20 10:58:36

> >It does end up sticking another function in the requirements, but it
> >seems that could just be called directly. Would you be willing to
> >make the change to common-names so we can reduce the syntactic
> >overhead? Also, could we pick a less-generic name for this,
> >something like common-variant-tags?
>
> Yes to both questions :-)
>
> I'm in Windows land for now so I won't get to it until late tonight or
> tomorrow.

This issue affects those of that are using [common-names ] in our own
Jamfiles (regex lib for example), should these be changed (if so to what),
and will/does the old [ common-names ] rule still work?

Thanks,

John.