Re: [jamboost] Re: every static library built twice ?

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-19 08:30:41

Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
> using the vc7.1 toolset I get files like:
> boost_date_time-vc71-mt-s-1_31.dll
> boost_date_time-vc71-s-1_31.dll
> boost_thread-vc71-mt-s-1_31.dll
> I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around the concept of a static dll or 
> what it would mean

> At Thursday 2003-12-18 08:59, you wrote:
>>2003-12-18 08:09 2 211 284 libboost_signals-mgw-d-1_31.lib
>>2003-12-18 08:08 2 211 284 libboost_signals-mgw-sd-1_31.lib
>>2003-12-18 08:08 2 219 086 libboost_signals-mgw-mt-sd-1_31.lib
>>2003-12-18 08:09 2 219 086 libboost_signals-mgw-mt-d-1_31.lib
>>
>>IIUC there shouldn't be such file as "libboost_signals-mgw-d-1_31.lib"
>>or "libboost_signals-mgw-mt-d-1_31.lib" . Prefix "lib" means that these
>>files are static liraries, thus each should have "-s" flag set.

>From the documentation...

s = Static link to runtime.

In other words.. s != Static library.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden] - 102708583_at_icq