Re: [jamboost] Re: every static library built twice ?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-20 05:55:40

> using the vc7.1 toolset I get files like:
> boost_date_time-vc71-mt-s-1_31.dll
> boost_date_time-vc71-s-1_31.dll
> boost_thread-vc71-mt-s-1_31.dll
> I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around the concept of a static dll or
> what it would mean

Dll's shouldn't be built with a static runtime - it generally leads to all
kinds of memory errors - there should be a <runtime-link>dynamic requirement
on all the dll targets in the Jamfiles, if there aren't it's a bug IMO.

John.