Re: [jamboost] Re: every static library built twice ?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-21 06:17:02

> And the re-enabling of the DLL for date_time doesn't work for CodeWarrior.

Your right - I've double checked Jeff's source, and it's set up so that:

msvc - insists on a dll interface whenever a dll runtime is used, but
doesn't actually export all of the symbols in the dll.
Other windows compilers - no dll building support.

There is also a <runtime-link>static requirement on the static lib build
which definitely should not be there (removed).

I'll raise the dll building issues with Jeff on the main list.

John.