From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-26 13:16:54
David Abrahams wrote:
> > No, I did not build "test", I just run "bjam". I'm pretty sure it
> > worked for me for a long time. Now it really does not run anything
> > -- though I think it runned something on the previous try ...
> That doesn't seem right to me. Note that status/Jamfile contains
> # Make tests run by default.
> DEPENDS all : test ;
Ok, I understand how it's supposed to work. And I also understand why it
worked for me. It used 'unit-test' previously, and I guess it's built by
> in order to make this happen. We could use that in the each of the
> libs/xxx/test/Jamfile's. The idea is that you should be able to
> declare tests in a Jamfile without having them built by default.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk