From: Christopher Currie (Christopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-30 14:44:53
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I've just comitted code which computes proper library order for gcc. The
> implementation is quite simple and supposedly inefficient, but on my project
> the performance did not suffer.
> The only limitation is that the code does not work for searched libraries, but
> I'm going to fix that really soon.
> I'd appreciate some testing of this new code. I attach the notes telling how
> it's supposed to work.
My really dumb test works great, thanks so much for making this a
priority! I'll have to package this up to deploy to my closed network
for further stress testing. Hopefully I'll have results by the end of
the day, but monday at the latest.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk