Re: [jamboost] modifiers.jam

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-02 02:43:37

Pedro Ferreira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is it me or modifiers.jam is not up-to-date regarding the rest of BBv2?

Alas, I'm afraid they are not up-to-date. Looks like when I was changing class 
system, I've only partially changed 'modifiers.jam'. That's the problem is 
having no tests for a file.

> I'm trying to add version numbers to our DLLs and it looked like
> modifiers.jam would be a good approach. Should I try and fix it?

I though about things like library versions and names (e.g. adding "boost_" 
prefix) for installed libraries. Modifiers still look like the best approach.
So yes, you're welcome to take a stab and fixing them!

- Volodya