Re: [jamboost] Re: V2 documentation format: a resolution?

From: Douglas Paul Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-04 17:52:29

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Reece Dunn wrote:
> >Why html-single.xsl instead of html.xsl? I'm expecting that we want to use
> >chunking, because that one HTML page can get pretty long... :)
>
> I think this is confusion on my part as to the way boostbook works.
> Essentially, my stylesheet generates a HTML page for a chapter element.
> Where I think I was getting confused was the xi:include stuff at the end.

I'd have to check it out, because I'm a big confused as well :)

> What I should have said was that my stylesheet does not (yet :)) support
> xi:include, unless this is supported by xsltproc. This is easy to do, using
> something like:

xsltproc does support XIncludes. Pass it the --xinclude flag (the
BoostBook tools already do this, of course).

Doug