Re: V2 documentation format: a resolution?

From: Christopher Currie (Christopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-08 23:54:13

Reece Dunn wrote:
> What do you think of the new look and feel? I have updated 
> boostbook/xsl/html.xsl and boost/doc/html/boostbook.css. The latest versions 
> can be found at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/BoostBookLaF/
> 
> There has been discussion on it over on the Boost.Doc mailling list. If you 
> want an instant gague of what the new style is like, add boostbook.css in 
> boost/doc/html/ as reference.css - it contains most of the style changes. 
> Otherwise, you can run bjam to create the new documents.
> 
> I'd welcome any feedback and areas of improvement :). NOTE: you can edit the 
> CSS file to create your own look & feel :).

FWIW, I've just checked in a change to the Jamfile.v2 for 
tools/build/v2/doc that will copy the latest stylesheet and images to 
the appropriate places, and the html.xsl should now use boostbook.css as 
its default stylesheet. This will facilitate building just the 
Boost.Build docs locally, rather than having to build all the BoostBook 
based docs.

Let me know if people have problems building the docs.

Christopher