From: Zbynek Winkler (zwin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 11:32:41
Christopher Currie wrote:
>>As I understood this would be the only documentation on Boost.Build2
>>so it probably should not be called User Manual either.
> Do you have a suggestion for a better name? Volodya has commented that
> he thought that a "developer's manual" should be a separate document, so
> if we broke those bits out would it be better?
I think that the problem here is that I am not sure who is "user" and who is
"developer". Could someone supply some examples? IMHO such a distinction is
difficult to make. At which point a user writing a Jamfile becomes a developer
writing a Jamfile? I am not very fond of splitting the docs in such a matter.
Maybe Volodya has some reasons I am no aware of?
-- http://zw.matfyz.cz/ http://robotika.cz/ Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk