Re: [jamboost] Re: V2

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 12:47:40

Ok, where is the proper place to report irregularities with BBv2 ?
I thought this was the discussion.

At Sunday 2004-02-08 09:26, you wrote:
>"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > I beg to differ. It DOES
> >
> >
> > version 1.6 of Jamfile.v2
>
>As I said, "you're building with BBv2, which is not officially
>supported yet."
>
>Boost itself does NOT depend on bison. Boost as a whole can't take
>responsibility for whatever pre-release tools you may choose to use.
>
> > contains the line you say it shouldn't do
> > I checked it against the cvs repository and it's up to date
> > the line was added (according to annotate)
> > 1.3 (vladimir 23-Oct-02): build-project libs/graph/build ;
> >
> > it's still in the file
>
>Oh, I know it's there. I'm saying that it shouldn't be.
>
> > bison IS in the path
> > it complains: bison.simple: No such file or directory
> > bison.simple is in the same directory as bison.exe
> > my command for running bjamv2 is:
> > bjam --v2 >bjamv2.log
> >
> > this is run from the same directory that I run:
> > bjam -sTOOLS=vc7.1 install >bjaminstall.log
> >
> >

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"