Re: help with Borland build break

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-29 13:03:13

Eric Niebler wrote:

> 
> That's too complicated for such a simple thing. I could just add my own 
> overloads of boost::std_min and boost::std_max for unsigned int. I don't 
> even have to limit their existence to the Borland toolset. I'll check 
> it in ASAP to unwedge the Borland build.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I meant "unsigned long" instead of "unsigned int".

OK, I've checked in the fix. I limited the fix to the Borland toolset 
after all. If someone with Borland installed can run a quick sanity 
check, that'd be great.

Thanks.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com