Re: bjam --v2 isn't working for me

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 09:51:54

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
>> when I simply do:
>> bjam --v2 >bjamv2.log
>> in my daily test scripts, I get the following in bjamv2.log
>> ==========================================================
>> C:/Projects/boost/tools/build/v2/util\order.jam:38: in load
>> error: no native rule "add-pair" defined in module "class_at_order."
>
> This means you have to rebuilt bjam again :-(
> I haven't yet decided if bumping version on all such changes is a worthwhile, 
> since "native rules" are for optimization and we're likely to add quite a lot 
> of them. If we bump version each time we'll get something like 3.1.50 in no 
> time ;-)

So what? What's the point of having a version number if we don't use
it?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com