From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-03 10:11:26
I re-built jam and the version didn't change
and what's wrong with 3.1.50?
at least we don't think two _different_ things are the same
I say again... I understand the need to bootstrap, what I don't understand
is the need to manually maodify jam...why can't it be done in the build?
At Tuesday 2004-03-02 06:29, you wrote:
>Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
> > when I simply do:
> > bjam --v2 >bjamv2.log
> > in my daily test scripts, I get the following in bjamv2.log
> > ==========================================================
> > C:/Projects/boost/tools/build/v2/util\order.jam:38: in load
> > error: no native rule "add-pair" defined in module "class_at_order."
>This means you have to rebuilt bjam again :-(
>I haven't yet decided if bumping version on all such changes is a worthwhile,
>since "native rules" are for optimization and we're likely to add quite a lot
>of them. If we bump version each time we'll get something like 3.1.50 in no
>Yahoo! Groups Links
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk