From: Zbynek Winkler (zwin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-13 14:29:44
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Here are the results:
> It has helped me already 1 vote (off-list)
> Sounds important 1 vote
> Not a big deal, can live without it 1 vote
> Eeh.. it just produces pointless messages I can't understand
> 0 votes
> Never heard about this 0 votes
> And my own vote goes for "pointless messages". So, the distibution is very
> even and it's hard to draw a coclusion. Guess I'll have to decide myself.
If it has not been decided yet, I'd go for the 'it has helped me already' as I
have defined my own feature not to be link-compatible so I guess I am actively
using the feature.
And as a side note - I've just found out that msvc-6.0 is not link-compatible
with msvc-7.1 but bjam does not define those two to be link-incompatible.
And a question - I have bunch of declarations such as
lib cppunit : : <name>cppunit60 <variant>release <toolset-msvc:version>6.0
I've determined the syntax only by try-and-error and by searching through the
source files of v2 (Is there some documentation for it? I've searched for
'condition'...). I expected
lib cppunit : : <name>cppunit60 <variant>release <toolset>msvc-6.0
What is wrong with that?
-- http://zw.matfyz.cz/ http://robotika.cz/ Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk