From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-23 00:39:19
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Zbynek Winkler wrote:
>> > feature mode : 1 2 3 4
>> > : link-incompatible ignored-unless-explicitly-made-relevant ;
>> > lib test : test.cpp : <explicitly-relevant-feature>mode
>> > : : <explicit-relevant-feature>mode ;
>> > exe app : app.cpp test ;
>> > With this setup, 'mode' feature will only affect target which have
>> > explicitly specified that they care about 'mode'. What do you think?
>> > (Note that this just an idea, syntax details might be different).
>> So when I build 'app' - will it have mode set?
> Yes, since <explicitly-relevant-feature>mode is in usage requirements and will
> propagate to 'app'.
Yikes, that's long!
What's wrong with
And how is ignored-unless-explicitly-made-relevant different from the
default? If it isn't, it should be removed. If it is, we should
find a shorter name. IMO.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk