Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-16 10:24:56

Next message: Erik Purins: "specifying requirements : variant and toolset for feature-value"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] triggering the stage rule"
In reply to: Toon Knapen: "gcc-tools.jam and compiling in 64bit"

Toon Knapen wrote:

> AFAICT it is currently not possible to force gcc-tools.jam to compile in
> 64bit on sparc and power architectures. Would it be ok to add:
>
> flags gcc CFLAGS <address-model>64 : -m64 ;
>
> in both the SPARC section and the power section ?

Don't see any problems in adding it :-)

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

Next message: Erik Purins: "specifying requirements : variant and toolset for feature-value"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] triggering the stage rule"
In reply to: Toon Knapen: "gcc-tools.jam and compiling in 64bit"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk