From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-27 07:32:10
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Hi Jürgen,
> Jürgen Hunold wrote:
>> lib boost_test_exec_monitor : $(TEST_EXEC_MON_SOURCES).cpp
>> : <toolset>borland:<cxxflags>-w-8080
>> This breaks with the following message:
>> error: "borland" is not a known value of feature <toolset>
>> legal values: "gcc"
>> when no "using borland ;" is specified in user-config.jam or elsewhere.
>> I think this is a know issue, isn't it ?
> No, this is not a known issue and it fact I've introduced the regression (?)
> yesterday. Until now, the properties inside condition (the <toolset>borland
> part above) was not checked for correctness at all. While fixing another bug,
> I've accidentally caused it to be checked.
> Now the question:
> Do we need validation for condition?
> For example, if we have:
> it's possible to ask user to have "using msvc ; " somewhere. But that might
> cause warnings that msvc is not found. Further, for
> user should declare *specific* version of toolset.. It's hard to do that
> inside boost's project-root.jam, because it's not clear what path to use, for
> example, and how the user can configure the same version in user-config.jam
> So, we've two choices:
> 1. Don't validate condition at all
> 2. Provide the means for user to say: 'msvc-7.1' is OK as the value. This,
> however, might be very tricky, since "msvc-7.1' is really a shortcut for
3. Automatically do "using msvc" the first time such a condition is
encountered. However, set things up so the toolset won't complain
about not finding the compiler.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk