Re: [jamboost] --v2 problems on vc7.1

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-30 18:09:28

At Sunday 2004-05-30 11:30, you wrote:
>Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
>
> > nope, I extract ALL of boost every night (including, I trust, bjam) and
> > explicitly build bjam (something I've been complaining about, since IMO
> > bjam should be able to build itself)
>
>So the only thing left is that there is a space on the executable path
>for g++ and the gcc toolset is not quoting the invocation. And looking
>at the toolset that is the problem. I'll fix it now, should be in CVS in
>a few minutes.
>
>As for bjam building itself.. do you mean something other than running:
>
> bjam --toolset=gcc --toolset-root=/usr/local/gcc-3.2.3/bin
>
>??
>
>Can't quite remember the previous conversation on this :-\

don't think we had one... ... see other message. I was rather surprised 
when the version build for vc71 seemed to be building stuff for cygwin

where should I be cd'd to build jam? in the jam_src directory?

>--
>-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
>-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
>-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"