From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-09 08:12:12
David Abrahams wrote:
> >> I think we could get into trouble with separate "using" statements in
> >> site_config / user_config. Don't forget that site_config may be
> >> installed by some sysadmin somewhere.
> > Then I wonder what could be done? Maybe, just a policy that shared
> > site_config may not use versionless init.
> I don't have specifics in mind, but I have the feeling we just need a
> way to give people a little bit more explicit control: "I don't care
> what you saw before; 'gcc' now means gcc-3.4"
Let's cross the bridge when we arrive there. I have some implementation ideas
(e.g. ignore "using gcc" in site-config if there were "using gcc" in
user-config), but without user input it's hard to figure out the right
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk