Re: [jamboost] V1 testing question

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-10 01:39:08

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > The V2 testing.jam has his logic:
>
> ------V1 ??

Ah.. yes. Though V2 now has exactly the same logic.

> > So, verbose output is generated when value of "VERBOSE_TEST" is 0, while
> > I would think the verbose output should be generated when the value if 1.
> > Why does it work this way? Is there any specific reason, or it just
> > happened this way?
>
> It just happened to work out that way. When I rewrote that part
> testing.jam I was testing the value directly, without the EQU/-eq, so
> the value needed to be zero.

Ok, I won't touch V1 but will reverse the logic for V2.

Thanks,
Volodya