From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-16 00:53:37
Mark Elston wrote:
> Great!! Thanks again.
> I've never tried mixing -Wall and -w before. I'll try it out.
> What is the difference between the current approach and having a
> 'general' <warning-level> option, or something similar? This could
> default to a specific value (-Wall for gcc) or be set as other options
> in a project's requirements. Perhaps there is no difference. I just
> have an aversion to making hard-coded assumptions about the way
> *everyone* will use something :)
Actually, that logic was copied from Boost.Build V1, so the reasons are
unknown. I decided not to change those -Wall since I *personally* thought
it's a good thing. Another reason is that making a feature for every compiler
option is not so good, if there's cxxflags which allow fine-tuning.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk