From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-22 01:25:06
Finlay Dobbie wrote:
> Just a few questions from a newbie jammer:
> I was just wondering if there has been any interest in pulling in
> Apple's jam extensions (the export and deferred keywords for variables,
> for example)?
Apple's jam? I did not know it existed. There's quite a number of jam
> Are the improvements to Boost.Jam going to make their way up-stream?
Hardly likely. Seems like neither party is particularly interested.
> Conversely, is Boost.Jam going to move to Jam 2.5?
Well... I think we only interested in getting the offical jam changes which
are interesting for us. Looking at 2.5 release notes, I see for example this:
The 'return' statement now actually returns, and there are now
break & continue statements for for & while loops.
which is interesting, though I'm not sure if we're going to merge even this,
since last time I did a merge, it was very tiresome activity.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk