From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-23 02:45:46
Christopher Currie wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > I've just made another round of simplifying toolset initialization, and
> > touched gcc, intel and sun. The changes are:
> This is a welcome change and improvement, thanks for making it so clean!
> This now allows me a configuration I've always wanted, which is the
> ability to support the Purify tool as a version of the compiler:
> using sun : purify : "purify CC" ;
> allows me to use "bjam sun-purify" as an alternate toolset. Great work!
Cool. I wonder, though, if the above "using" syntax gives you a warning that
compiler is not found? Of course, that's only a warning, but would be nice to
> > And finally a question. Does anybody object if I really switch all the
> > other toolsets to use command name as opposed to "root directory"? I.e.
> > using borland : : H:\CBuilderX ;
> > will become
> > using borland : : H:\CBuilderX\bin\bcc32.exe ;
> > This syntax is more verbose, but it can be uniform for all toolsets -- so
> > users don't have to remember which toolsets needs a full path, and which
> > a path to 'installation root'.
> I think this is an excellent idea. Being able to specify the executable
> explicity is what allows me the above,
I'm afraid for msvc, which need to find a path to "setup script", it would be
hard to prepend arguments like "purify", at least for now.
> and I think there should be a
> consistent initialization for all toolsets.
That's for sure. Let me pick the next victim... that's going to be borland
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk