Re: [jamboost] Bjam in C++?

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-24 09:22:54

Vladimir Prus wrote:

> Two thoughts:
> 1. Java support is only being written, so maybe it's not important
I know but I just wanted to argument that non-C++ developers would want 
to compile bjam too.

> 2. Is there g++ for those platforms?
Yes but they are very hard to compile succesfully on those platforms 
(for instance I tried on HPUX but never succeeded and this is a known 
problem). And even if it compiles succesfully, often clashes between the 
gcc headers and system headers occur.