From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-24 09:22:54
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Two thoughts:
> 1. Java support is only being written, so maybe it's not important
I know but I just wanted to argument that non-C++ developers would want
to compile bjam too.
> 2. Is there g++ for those platforms?
Yes but they are very hard to compile succesfully on those platforms
(for instance I tried on HPUX but never succeeded and this is a known
problem). And even if it compiles succesfully, often clashes between the
gcc headers and system headers occur.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk