Re: Bjam in C++?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-26 09:33:09

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

>
> As far as I'm concerned:
>
> 1. We're not going to drop bjam syntax in Jamfile for quite some time.
> 2. Even if we drop it, we'll have to write conversion scripts, and preserve as 
> much of the current syntax as possible. I sure don't want some "Boost.Build 
> V3" to be incompatible with V2.

I agree.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com