From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-26 09:33:09
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> As far as I'm concerned:
> 1. We're not going to drop bjam syntax in Jamfile for quite some time.
> 2. Even if we drop it, we'll have to write conversion scripts, and preserve as
> much of the current syntax as possible. I sure don't want some "Boost.Build
> V3" to be incompatible with V2.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk