From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-02 10:14:06
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> > Folks, how do you feel about some rule like:
>> > use-property ( property )
>> > which would be used like:
>> > use-property <os>NT ;
>> > and will make NT a valid value of the <os> feature. If <os>NT is defined
>> > already, the above will be no-op?
>> > This is something we planned for some time... maybe we should add it now?
>> > Thoughts?
>> Seems as though it ought to be unneccessary, doesn't it?
> Why? The problem is: you want to use <toolset>msvc in requirements.
But only as a condition, right? If it were an actual requirement,
also asking people to have "using msvc" would be no problem.
> You don't want to "using msvc " because that would warn that msvc is
> not installed. So you need a way to say the <toolset>msvc is OK.
Why shouldn't the person who defines the <toolset> feature do that
once instead of requiring everyone who wants to use it in a condition
to do a use-property?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk